贪心 发表于 2025-3-25 05:26:33
Introduction,cts is possible and the ground of the distinction between abstract and concrete entities. When the problem of abstract objects is stated with this generality, it could arguably be regarded as a long-standing philosophical concern, just as much present in Plato’s theory of forms and scholastic debaterefraction 发表于 2025-3-25 11:19:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2834/283365/283365_22.png笼子 发表于 2025-3-25 11:53:40
Psychologism and Objectivity,psychologistic approaches to the philosophy of arithmetic. This rejection accordingly suggests an alternative construal of the status of mathematical objects as non spatio-temporal, yet objective. In the first section of the current chapter I engage in a detailed consideration of Husserl’s early phiELUC 发表于 2025-3-25 17:38:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2834/283365/283365_24.pngmosque 发表于 2025-3-25 22:49:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2834/283365/283365_25.pngaphasia 发表于 2025-3-26 02:39:21
The Concrete-Abstract Distinction,e reference for abstract singular terms. Once he has abandoned a strong reading of the context principle, in fact, Dummett’s strategy to derive answers to traditional epistemological and metaphysical problems through the theory of meaning appears to be placed in question. By acknowledging that the iGullible 发表于 2025-3-26 06:08:08
Tolerant Reductionism, context principle to legitimize a robust notion of reference for abstract singular terms. The rationale for Dummett’s rejection of a strong interpretation of the context principle as a thesis about reference is set out in his critique of the neo-Fregean philosophy of mathematics found in the work od-limonene 发表于 2025-3-26 11:34:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2834/283365/283365_28.pngNegligible 发表于 2025-3-26 15:13:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2834/283365/283365_29.png起草 发表于 2025-3-26 20:03:07
Introduction,t’ is nonetheless a recent addition to the philosophical lexicon concomitant with the application of new methods of logical analysis to traditional metaphysical problems. This suggests that contemporary debates about abstract entities reflect a significant conceptual shift rather than a superficial