micronized 发表于 2025-3-23 10:50:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2828/282719/282719_11.pngenumaerate 发表于 2025-3-23 14:04:04
Wittgenstein, Kripkenstein, and Meaning Experiences,long with the preparatory texts of its so-called second part, contains an obsessive debate that comes back again and again between Wittgenstein and himself, probably his earlier self, as regards the question of whether meaning can be captured in mentalistic terms, in particular in terms of an experi迎合 发表于 2025-3-23 21:50:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2828/282719/282719_13.pnginvert 发表于 2025-3-24 01:59:31
Conclusion,, more in particular, for analytic philosophy? First, fallibilism seems the policy to be recommended in philosophy, just as in science: one must properly pressure whatever seems to be true, in order to see whether it is not actually true. But this does not mean that there can be no philosophical truCoronary 发表于 2025-3-24 06:01:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2828/282719/282719_15.png载货清单 发表于 2025-3-24 10:26:03
978-3-031-04452-6The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl高度表 发表于 2025-3-24 13:24:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2828/282719/282719_17.pngInclement 发表于 2025-3-24 18:02:21
Vasyl Tkachivskyi,Mariya Tkachivskasophical theses and argumentative rigor in the articulation and defense of such theses. This appeal to clarity and argumentative rigor certainly points to one of the merits of analytic philosophy. Yet in the history of analytic philosophy, this sort of argumentative stance against both other kinds oIntractable 发表于 2025-3-24 20:11:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2828/282719/282719_19.pngticlopidine 发表于 2025-3-25 02:02:03
Unzuverlässiges Erzählen im Hörspielcommonplace to hold that Russell’s critique of Meinong’s theory of objects is a notable exception to this somewhat deplorable theoretical situation. For according to many people, Russell’s theory of descriptions would definitely rule out Meinong’s ontologico-metaphysical doctrine. To be sure, in rec