Itinerant
发表于 2025-3-28 14:43:32
The Epistemology of Beliefof representations, have their contents limited by the sort of information the system in which they occur can pick up and process. If a system—measuring instrument, animal or human being—cannot process information to the effect that something is ., it cannot represent something as .. From this it fo
飞镖
发表于 2025-3-28 20:32:47
Brains Don’t Lie: They Don’t Even Make Many Mistakes Several years ago, in his book ., Hilary Putnam purported to solve that problem by proving that we are not brains in a vat. I am now inclined to believe that Putnam’s argument is, in all essential respects, correct..
epicondylitis
发表于 2025-3-29 00:35:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2828/282715/282715_43.png
老巫婆
发表于 2025-3-29 05:46:20
Arbitrary Reasonsuld never in the first place have believed the most fundamental claims we use as support for other views. We had no reason to believe them. Justification must . somewhere, yet all beginnings are arbitrary and hence unacceptable. The practical skeptic can reason analogously: since we ought never to d
GEN
发表于 2025-3-29 08:57:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2828/282715/282715_45.png
LATE
发表于 2025-3-29 13:27:04
0921-8599 uld permit us to consider their already published work. Out of all this material, the co-editors have put together the present collection. We believe that this 978-94-010-7367-7978-94-009-1942-6Series ISSN 0921-8599 Series E-ISSN 2542-8349
diabetes
发表于 2025-3-29 17:08:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2828/282715/282715_47.png
激怒某人
发表于 2025-3-29 23:46:52
Contextualization at Macro-Levelssical issues concerning skepticism seem to fall most naturally into “normative” epistemology. The arguments of the skeptic most often . metaepistemological positions but there is often far too little explicit discussion of the nature of knowledge or justified belief. Those of us who think that meta
不真
发表于 2025-3-30 03:45:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2828/282715/282715_49.png
清唱剧
发表于 2025-3-30 06:12:56
US Leadership in Political Time and Spacewarranted in asserting this.. I have no quarrel with that claim. However, I do want to question the implicit, and widely shared, assumption that had John. shown up (and shown up for the right reasons) then Bill. does know.