Reticent
发表于 2025-3-21 18:25:14
书目名称Doing the Best We Can影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0282434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Doing the Best We Can影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0282434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Doing the Best We Can网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0282434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Doing the Best We Can网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0282434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Doing the Best We Can被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0282434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Doing the Best We Can被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0282434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Doing the Best We Can年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0282434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Doing the Best We Can年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0282434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Doing the Best We Can读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0282434<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Doing the Best We Can读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0282434<br><br> <br><br>
珠宝
发表于 2025-3-21 23:21:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282434/282434_2.png
纬度
发表于 2025-3-22 03:14:56
Utilitarian FoundationsRoughly, the idea is that something is obligatory if and only if it is the best of the possibilities. This idea appears in very simple guise in the popular maxim that “you ought to do the best you can”. Classic act utilitarianism is perhaps the most famous theoretical development of the idea. On tha
Myocarditis
发表于 2025-3-22 08:35:20
A Theory of Moral Obligationaditional formulations are unacceptable. In order to formulate this insight adequately, we must have a suitable concept of possibility to account for the meaning of ‘can’ and a suitable concept of value to account for the meaning of ‘best’. In Section 1 of this chapter, I explain my concept of possi
宿醉
发表于 2025-3-22 12:07:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282434/282434_5.png
MULTI
发表于 2025-3-22 16:45:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282434/282434_6.png
MULTI
发表于 2025-3-22 18:12:21
Defeasible Commitment and Prima Facie Obligationeveral different sorts of proposition. As I see it, this fact is responsible for one of the most serious defects in the literature concerning iffy oughts. We frequently find cases in which one writer, focussing on one sort of iffy ought, proposes an analysis. He claims to have given an account of “c
Generator
发表于 2025-3-22 21:19:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282434/282434_8.png
过于光泽
发表于 2025-3-23 02:53:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282434/282434_9.png
攀登
发表于 2025-3-23 08:04:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282434/282434_10.png