招人嫉妒 发表于 2025-3-23 11:40:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2698-5quivocal than christening (e.g. by some obscure stepwise processes taking place during the forgotten prehistory of mankind) — but in principale in the same manner. As Tichý (1992) puts it, language is a code and a theory of language thus has to consist in cracking the code.calorie 发表于 2025-3-23 15:23:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282431/282431_12.pngaccessory 发表于 2025-3-23 21:46:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282431/282431_13.pngLumbar-Spine 发表于 2025-3-24 01:40:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282431/282431_14.png思想 发表于 2025-3-24 04:04:52
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2698-5nt distinction is thus absolutely crucial. It is the existence of this distinction that makes logic meaningful; and it is this distinction that makes it possible to make sense of the concept of meaning.Mettle 发表于 2025-3-24 07:00:01
Necessity,nt distinction is thus absolutely crucial. It is the existence of this distinction that makes logic meaningful; and it is this distinction that makes it possible to make sense of the concept of meaning.放大 发表于 2025-3-24 13:18:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282431/282431_17.pngSOBER 发表于 2025-3-24 18:42:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282431/282431_18.pngscotoma 发表于 2025-3-24 23:01:39
Quantification,le of recursive constraints reducing satisfaction of such statements to satisfaction of their substatements. The idea flowing from this is to handle quantificational statements analogously; to find analogous recursive constraints for quantificational statements. Attempting this, though, we immediateGRACE 发表于 2025-3-24 23:19:29
Truth,of capturing truth .? After all, necessary truth seems to be a subspecies, a special case of truth — is not every account for necessary truth thus a special case of a general theory, which would yield truth . as another special case?