分散 发表于 2025-3-26 22:17:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282403/282403_31.pngexpdient 发表于 2025-3-27 02:29:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282403/282403_32.pngFADE 发表于 2025-3-27 05:35:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282403/282403_33.pngobservatory 发表于 2025-3-27 12:58:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16304-5stic approach to conceptual change. By distinguishing two modes of continuity, I also propose a new mode of conceptual continuity. Finally, I illustrate and defend my approach by revisiting my historical case study.Seizure 发表于 2025-3-27 16:06:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282403/282403_35.png食物 发表于 2025-3-27 20:53:05
Introduction,at a balanced inquiry from which both history of science and philosophy of science can benefit. In a nutshell, integrated HPS maintains that HPS should be both a good philosophy of science and a good history of science at the same time.地牢 发表于 2025-3-28 01:55:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282403/282403_37.png重力 发表于 2025-3-28 03:57:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282403/282403_38.png精美食品 发表于 2025-3-28 06:31:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2825/282403/282403_39.pngcogitate 发表于 2025-3-28 14:03:44
Promisingness in Theory Choicetial progressiveness, Lakatos’ predictive novelty, McMullin’s P-fertility, Laudan’s fertility-promise, Ivani’s fruitfulness, and Šešelja et al’s pursuit worthiness. Finally, I argue for the promisingness criterion from a normative viewpoint.