偶像
发表于 2025-3-26 21:49:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2816/281550/281550_31.png
dendrites
发表于 2025-3-27 03:01:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2816/281550/281550_32.png
小卒
发表于 2025-3-27 08:27:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2816/281550/281550_33.png
情感脆弱
发表于 2025-3-27 12:52:34
The Extent of Dispositional Reality,ount there is no robust divide between dispositional and categorical properties, but the result still qualifies as a form of dualism: Dispositional Reality may be a vast region of metaphysical structure, but there is little reason to think that it exhausts it.
Optimum
发表于 2025-3-27 15:47:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2816/281550/281550_35.png
Communicate
发表于 2025-3-27 20:47:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2816/281550/281550_36.png
角斗士
发表于 2025-3-28 00:58:22
Dispositional Reality,t some) dispositional talk is not merely true, but metaphysically perspicuous. Based on the metaphysical backdrop of the previous chapters, I will show that this dispositional aspect of reality is not a thing, and thus not a property of any kind. An explicitly nominalist version of the position is t
开始没有
发表于 2025-3-28 03:01:14
In Favour of Dispositional Reality,ereby expanded, to score a point in favour of Dispositional Reality one must argue that dispositional talk is preferable, or explanatorily indispensable in our best possible accounting of the nomic family, which requires a holistic evaluation of metaphysical theories as bodies of explanations. Furth
不如乐死去
发表于 2025-3-28 06:39:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2816/281550/281550_39.png
RAFF
发表于 2025-3-28 14:23:36
Explaining with Dispositions,es, sometimes called governance, and the (constitutive) explanation of laws of nature. This will also be an opportunity to present and discuss a taxonomy of the kinds non-causal explanations required. These explanations are pursued with a deflationary spirit in mind, discharging property-talk, essen