GEST 发表于 2025-3-23 11:18:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2814/281333/281333_11.pngpus840 发表于 2025-3-23 16:09:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2814/281333/281333_12.png变化 发表于 2025-3-23 20:41:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2814/281333/281333_13.png别名 发表于 2025-3-24 00:59:36
Dirk Möhlenbruch,Christian Meierith appropriate signs for cross derivatives, seemed basically mistaken. ., linear functions never work in global dynamics. ., linear demand functions are not consistent with utility maximization because they do not fulfil budget constraints. They can locally approximate proper demand functions, but,热烈的欢迎 发表于 2025-3-24 05:57:12
Leistungssysteme im Einzelhandelf two sellers on a line interval may be considered technically tricky, especially if we want elastic demand, which we do. The author has thought about this perspective over a long period and also seen many attempts by others, essentially still one dimensional with a thick strip replacing the thin li法律 发表于 2025-3-24 08:56:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2814/281333/281333_16.pngconservative 发表于 2025-3-24 11:33:44
Grammatik von Aufstellungsformenrofitable than either Cournot equilibrium or Stackelberg leadership. The question was also raised why Stackelberg never considered dynamic action in just his own model: If the follower indeed follows the proper Cournot best reply at every move the leader chooses to take, why does the leader not desiExpiration 发表于 2025-3-24 18:21:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18738-5rketed commodities, but their (metric) performance scores were entered in the utility functions. The marketed commodities were hence considered as bundles of such properties, designed by the producers. Lancaster assumed a simple linear structure for the connection between commodities and their prope现实 发表于 2025-3-24 20:33:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2814/281333/281333_19.png发展 发表于 2025-3-24 23:09:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74415-5Mathematical Economics; Nonlinear Systems; Periodic, Quasi-periodic, Chaotic Dynamics; Industrial Organ