果园 发表于 2025-3-21 18:40:09

书目名称Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/if/?ISSN=BK0280968<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ifr/?ISSN=BK0280968<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/at/?ISSN=BK0280968<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/atr/?ISSN=BK0280968<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tc/?ISSN=BK0280968<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tcr/?ISSN=BK0280968<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ii/?ISSN=BK0280968<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/iir/?ISSN=BK0280968<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5y/?ISSN=BK0280968<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5yr/?ISSN=BK0280968<br><br>        <br><br>

无表情 发表于 2025-3-21 21:47:08

Molecular Sememics: Toward A Model of an Ordinary Language shows how in ordinary language it is this brief moment of choice, this “molecule”, that is in fact the sememe, the fundamental unit of meaning. This molecule is created in momentary discourse, existing before conventionalization ‘fixes’ its terms, and failing to notice this gives the false impressi

notification 发表于 2025-3-22 02:47:32

Whorf, Orwell, and Mentalese (The Molecular Sememe: Some Implications for Semantics)‘mentalese’, a purely formal manipulation of logical concepts that then correlate to words. Contrary to the linguistic relativist hypothesis, all languages are fundamentally equal in this, and though the words may differ the thinking is the same. Here though, Caldwell proposes a different view, draw

包租车船 发表于 2025-3-22 07:03:16

The Coerciveness of Discourse around discourse, he distinguishes between two kinds: discourse in the . sense – a set of semantic relationships that become conventionalised through continuous use in the same way; and discourse in the . sense – a particular act of speech, writing, or conversation that takes place ‘within’ a disco

有说服力 发表于 2025-3-22 09:16:04

Molecular Sememics (Unfinished Book Manuscript)and he begins by presenting his motivation for the theory. It has the potential for explaining many facts about language, which, when taken together, are difficult to explain consistently within the current orthodoxies of linguistic study. Caldwell stresses that such an explanation can be found by f

无能力之人 发表于 2025-3-22 16:42:52

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280968/280968_6.png

无能力之人 发表于 2025-3-22 18:00:34

The Rhetoric of Plain Fact: Stevens’ “No Possum, No Sop, No Taters”lly on the ontological connections between language and perception unearthed in the poetry of Wallace Stevens. By implicitly utilizing his theory of Molecular Sememics, Caldwell aims to show that Stevens’ concern with poems that truly capture the phenomenology of experience offers a perfect example

debris 发表于 2025-3-22 23:52:09

American Shoot-Out: Hemingway vs. Richard Forde used as an aid for literary criticism. In commenting on the two authors’ styles, Caldwell notes that while Hemingway attempts to reify his words since he knows they will be distrusted as mere symbols, and Ford distrusts the words and categories he’s inherited as an author, both take up what Caldwe

Osteoarthritis 发表于 2025-3-23 04:34:39

What I Have Learned About English from Being in Japan (Or: Why Can’t Japanese Students of English Maakers of English provided supporting evidence for his theory of Molecular Sememics. Beginning with a discussion of the misuse of the determiners “a” and “the” by Japanese speakers of English, Caldwell finds that instead of systematic or syntactic rules being violated, it is a misunderstanding of the

judicial 发表于 2025-3-23 06:08:07

Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice978-3-319-75441-3Series ISSN 0924-4662 Series E-ISSN 2215-034X
页: [1] 2 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Discourse, Structure and Linguistic Choice; The Theory and Appli T. Price Caldwell,Oliver Cresswell,Robert J. Stain Book 2018 Springer Inte