修剪过的树篱 发表于 2025-3-25 05:58:35
, and ,: The Role of Subjective Positioning,nt support for the proposed modelisation. A number of further non-prototypical cases of each marker are studied before a conclusion which situates the approach relative to that of existing studies cited earlier.来自于 发表于 2025-3-25 08:34:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280944/280944_22.png总 发表于 2025-3-25 11:58:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280944/280944_23.pngCommemorate 发表于 2025-3-25 19:17:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280944/280944_24.pnginfatuation 发表于 2025-3-25 23:46:06
General Conclusion,r but as additional clues in the elaboration of its schematic form. It is hoped that this methodological approach will open new horizons both for enunciative linguistics and for corpus-based approaches to language.Certainty 发表于 2025-3-26 01:31:18
,: Configuration by Target Domain,” on the one hand, and “resumptive”, “topic-changing”, “conclusion” or “closure”, on the other. These contextually situated values of “anyway” depend upon the nature of the terms related and the nature of the relation, while the referential values for q result from its dialectic confrontation with the different configurations of the p / p* pair.刺耳 发表于 2025-3-26 04:31:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280944/280944_27.pngcrucial 发表于 2025-3-26 11:36:09
s (‘anyway’, ‘indeed’, ‘in fact’, ‘yet’, ‘still’, ‘like’ and ‘I think‘). This book will provide a valuable resource for students and researchers in linguistics with an interest in discourse markers, natural lan978-3-319-89008-1978-3-319-70905-5spondylosis 发表于 2025-3-26 14:36:20
Materiale Artefakte als Kompetenzmarkerts application to a selection of discourse markers in English. The chapter evokes a number of difficulties in the study of discourse markers. These include the term “discourse marker” itself and the range of theoretical approaches to the question, each with its own specific goals and technical appar极小 发表于 2025-3-26 19:18:44
Josef‘Kurz,Daniel Müller,Martin Gehrions (TEPO). After presenting the epistemological and methodological underpinnings, Ranger introduces the tools of the theory in the form of a limited number of fundamental operations and operands from which more complex polyoperations may be constructed. The multicategorial, multifunctional nature