confide 发表于 2025-3-25 04:04:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280599/280599_21.pngfatuity 发表于 2025-3-25 10:06:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280599/280599_22.png分期付款 发表于 2025-3-25 14:40:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280599/280599_23.pngWatemelon 发表于 2025-3-25 19:03:13
Direct Democracy and the Public Agenda: Ballot Initiatives and Public Beliefs about Important Problund that direct legislation meaningfully shapes the political lives of citizens. Not only do initiatives and referenda influence public policy (Boehmke 2005; Gerber 1999; Glazer and McGann, this volume; Matsusaka 2004) and governance (see Boehmke, Dalton, and Matsusaka, this volume) but they also shGUMP 发表于 2025-3-25 20:41:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280599/280599_25.pngPTCA635 发表于 2025-3-26 00:45:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280599/280599_26.png朦胧 发表于 2025-3-26 04:54:24
Direct Democracy and the Executive Branch,ative in nature, and the ultimate purpose of direct democracy is to break the legislature’s monopoly over law making. Not surprisingly, the study of how direct democracy impacts the legislature has been a staple of the literature for decades. Little, if any, research is available that focuses specifforecast 发表于 2025-3-26 10:41:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280599/280599_28.png清澈 发表于 2025-3-26 13:54:24
Direct Democracy and Good Governance: Does It Matter?, rivaled the populist era reforms early in the century (Cain, Dalton, and Scarrow 2003). This democratic transformation included reforms of the electoral system: direct primaries for presidential elections, term limits, and campaign finance reforms. Citizens gained new access to government through tCARE 发表于 2025-3-26 20:44:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280599/280599_30.png