凹槽
发表于 2025-3-26 21:53:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5583-4gence of public diplomacy as a bridge between diplomacy and the diversity of publics. The chapter aims at developing a rationale legitimating the presence of communication researchers in public diplomacy and emphasises the link between public diplomacy, public relations and international public relations.
遍及
发表于 2025-3-27 03:59:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280572/280572_32.png
训诫
发表于 2025-3-27 07:24:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280572/280572_33.png
Initiative
发表于 2025-3-27 12:38:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280572/280572_34.png
树胶
发表于 2025-3-27 17:08:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280572/280572_35.png
讨好美人
发表于 2025-3-27 20:46:14
Introduction: The Rationale for a Communication Perspective,ps between individuals. Communication also allows the constitution of organisations (Kuhn, 2012; Putnam & McPhee, 2009; Putnam & Nicotera, 2009), other collective forms of association (Sillince, 2010) and academic fields (Wenzel & Will, 2019). Therefore, a communicational perspective becomes vital g
奖牌
发表于 2025-3-28 00:14:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280572/280572_37.png
话
发表于 2025-3-28 05:31:22
From Diplomacy to (New) Public Diplomacy: A Communication Perspectivewadays from a European point of view. Diplomacy is approached from a communication perspective, studying how a diachronic analysis enlightens the emergence of public diplomacy as a bridge between diplomacy and the diversity of publics. The chapter aims at developing a rationale legitimating the pres
Connotation
发表于 2025-3-28 09:48:59
From Corporate to Organisational Diplomacyf the word corporate in a European context, namely as synonymous with business. Reflecting on the business sphere associated with corporate diplomacy, the chapter explores how the notion of “organisation” is filling the gap, going beyond the business logic, addressing and including the broad spectru
BARB
发表于 2025-3-28 11:44:51
Conceptual Pathways to Civil Society Diplomacyated to the “diplomacies” of non-state actors, non-state civil society actors in particular. This unification of complementary, overlapping, or contradictory concepts is necessary in order to empower a society-centric perspective on the role on civil society actors on the global diplomatic arena in