Implicit
发表于 2025-3-23 13:11:13
Overview: 978-3-663-05374-3978-3-663-05373-6
FOLD
发表于 2025-3-23 14:50:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280527/280527_12.png
意外的成功
发表于 2025-3-23 18:22:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4424-3The progress of modern scholars in recovering the outlines of Dionysius’ . and . has already been described in the Introduction; we must now concern ourselves with several difficulties presented by the testimonia on these and other works, particularly by the . and the scholia to Apollonius of Rhodes.
Myosin
发表于 2025-3-24 00:45:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01884-8For a determination of the date of Scytobrachion modern scholars have generally relied on a single testimonium (Suet. . 7 = T 3):
精致
发表于 2025-3-24 04:34:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2806/280527/280527_15.png
完成
发表于 2025-3-24 07:12:19
Dionysius’ WorksThe progress of modern scholars in recovering the outlines of Dionysius’ . and . has already been described in the Introduction; we must now concern ourselves with several difficulties presented by the testimonia on these and other works, particularly by the . and the scholia to Apollonius of Rhodes.
流眼泪
发表于 2025-3-24 11:13:28
Dionysius’ DateFor a determination of the date of Scytobrachion modern scholars have generally relied on a single testimonium (Suet. . 7 = T 3):
Enrage
发表于 2025-3-24 18:06:31
The ,In the preceding chapters reasons have been adduced for assigning part or all of three different papyri to the . of Dionysius of Mytilene, and for dating that work and the same author’s . to the period 270–220 B.C. It remains to examine the nature of these works themselves, and the literary traditions to which they belong.
POWER
发表于 2025-3-24 19:57:59
Introductionms, including Dionysius’ date, are only mentioned briefly here; a full treatment of them is possible only after the evidence of the new fragments on papyrus has been evaluated, and it is therefore reserved for Part II, Chapters iv – vi below.
faculty
发表于 2025-3-25 00:25:27
P. Mich. inv. 1316 versoby name, it seems unlikely that either is the main subject of the text. Lines 9–17 evidently contained an estimate of the arrangement .of a work (presumably on the Argonauts), but here too the precise subject is unclear, and perhaps there is a comparison between two works.