易怒
发表于 2025-3-25 05:35:32
http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/280499.jpg
泰然自若
发表于 2025-3-25 09:50:43
Xiangli Meng,Lingda Wu,Shaobo Yu,Xitao Zhangent dimensions of this phenomenon, clarifies different theories of practical necessity and their conceptual background, and gives a detailed description of the chapters and the ways in which they interact.
Trochlea
发表于 2025-3-25 14:29:23
Shuaijun Liu,Xin Hu,Weidong Wangor love. This kind of practical necessity differs in important ways from necessity connected with morality and rationality. It involves a normative claim, which can be specific to an individual rather than universal. And, love creates, rather than responds to, value. Something seems undeniably right
自作多情
发表于 2025-3-25 18:14:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280499/280499_24.png
自恋
发表于 2025-3-25 21:45:12
The Structure of the Atmospheric Layers addressees of strict claims that are grounded in our own individual personality. Thus, any agent would—at least in principle—be entitled to say “Here I stand I can do no other—because I am .” Why does Korsgaard hold that “being yourself” should have any strict normative implications? What kind of n
confederacy
发表于 2025-3-26 03:46:55
Astrophysics and Space Science Libraryor him to do otherwise, Luther could not act differently without going against who he was, that is, without violating his most essential convictions and values or, in short, his self. In this chapter, Michael Kühler addresses the question of what to make of this idea of personal practical necessity
figment
发表于 2025-3-26 07:35:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280499/280499_27.png
Obstreperous
发表于 2025-3-26 11:58:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51941-8totle provides us with a theoretical framework that is powerful enough to understand both the nature of practical necessity and the possibility of akratic agency—the latter being the most extreme opposite of practical necessity. Her chapter has two aims. First, it shows how Aristotle’s account of a
Muscularis
发表于 2025-3-26 14:34:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51941-8uishes between different types of weakness of will. In what sense should virtuous persons avoid being weak-willed persons? Why is acting akratically, or against one’s better judgments, bad for the weak-willed person who acts? To answer these questions, Pollmann asks whether personal integrity can ev
dainty
发表于 2025-3-26 17:37:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280499/280499_30.png