朝圣者
发表于 2025-3-25 06:11:45
Conclusion: A Future and Happy Immanence,truth always be made actual and true for the individual who makes the commitment to its realization? In ., he writes. “Philosophy is me. And it is also, equally, all of you, who read me, and think of me, or against me as well. For if there is thought, there is also the eternity of the earthly experi
新陈代谢
发表于 2025-3-25 07:39:43
esenting the dilemmas of his thought, the scholarly reader will be in a position to then pursue the necessary study to come to their own conclusions and, by doing so, become sufficiently free to resist the many coercions of social and political life in liberal democracies today..978-3-031-18298-3978-3-031-18296-9
记忆法
发表于 2025-3-25 14:19:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280449/280449_23.png
占卜者
发表于 2025-3-25 16:53:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280449/280449_24.png
prostatitis
发表于 2025-3-25 22:49:15
Giosuè GhisalbertiExamines the four truths of Alain Badiou’s core thinking: art, science, love, and politics.Identifies dilemmas in Badiou‘s work.Proposes a way to think beyond these dilemmas, and encourages the reader
HAUNT
发表于 2025-3-26 00:37:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280449/280449_26.png
squander
发表于 2025-3-26 05:02:38
Zwischen Intimität und Isolationn. He does so, first, by once again supporting the possibility of “the subject” (the individual) and then by turning away from the critical imperative towards a philosophy of affirmation. What would happen if, as a premise, and as a project, we simply gave up on our critical attitude and adopted ano
Infelicity
发表于 2025-3-26 09:32:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280449/280449_28.png
上腭
发表于 2025-3-26 15:03:46
Einleitung. Soziales Medienhandeln, in singling-out the scientist or, more specifically, the mathematician and, finally, nothing less than the .. Given Badiou’s privilege of the mathematical in his philosophical work and, in particular, the effect of the matheme, can a concept (that has no object) be considered scientific? Can the ma
吞噬
发表于 2025-3-26 18:17:05
Matthias C. Angermeyer,Dietrich Klusmannesents his readers with extremely difficult challenges. His understanding of love is not without its intimacy with hate. His . is written, he admits, as a confrontation; and for reasons that will be unsettling. Either we recognize the nature of his argument, and so give up on some of our illusions a