PED 发表于 2025-3-21 17:48:00

书目名称Digital Humanism影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0279417<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Digital Humanism影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0279417<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Digital Humanism网络公开度<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0279417<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Digital Humanism网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0279417<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Digital Humanism被引频次<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0279417<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Digital Humanism被引频次学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0279417<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Digital Humanism年度引用<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0279417<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Digital Humanism年度引用学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0279417<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Digital Humanism读者反馈<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0279417<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Digital Humanism读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0279417<br><br>        <br><br>

令人悲伤 发表于 2025-3-21 23:20:29

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2795/279417/279417_2.png

Carbon-Monoxide 发表于 2025-3-22 00:59:29

Endoscopic Resections: EMR and ESDs, do not “intend” anything with their utterances. They have no mental states, so they can neither make decisions nor communicate. No matter how much bots suggest they are communicating agents, they are only ever capable of . communicative acts. They may look like communicative acts, but they are not. Without intentionality, there is no meaning.

CLAM 发表于 2025-3-22 08:19:20

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2795/279417/279417_4.png

圆锥 发表于 2025-3-22 09:08:31

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2795/279417/279417_5.png

frugal 发表于 2025-3-22 16:11:07

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-39629-8h their owners or manufacturers must be liable or, whether, depending on their degree of autonomy, they will at some point enjoy a special status that grants them responsibility and rights. But is this philosophically sound? Or does this rely on a fundamental misunderstanding of what autonomy and (human) dignity means?

frugal 发表于 2025-3-22 18:25:32

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2795/279417/279417_7.png

Biguanides 发表于 2025-3-23 00:40:33

Steven J. Binenbaum,Ethan T. Paulintions make sense if they remain subject to human purpose and are culturally embedded. Furthermore as paradoxical as it may sound, economic success can only be achieved in the long term if all participants, customers, and employees alike are taken seriously as agents and are intrinsically motivated.

Soliloquy 发表于 2025-3-23 02:37:07

http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2795/279417/279417_9.png

sultry 发表于 2025-3-23 06:40:14

Christoph H. Lohmann,Alexander P. Krügertence of moral dilemmas as an expression of the general non-computability of our moral deliberations. Digital computers are defined as Turing machines and deliver unambiguous results. For this reason alone, they cannot be a model of practical reason.
页: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Digital Humanism; For a Humane Transfo Julian Nida-Rümelin,Nathalie Weidenfeld Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth