expdient 发表于 2025-3-25 04:25:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2739/273889/273889_21.png斜 发表于 2025-3-25 11:25:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2739/273889/273889_22.pngAffluence 发表于 2025-3-25 12:41:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2739/273889/273889_23.pngTHROB 发表于 2025-3-25 19:33:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2739/273889/273889_24.png抑制 发表于 2025-3-25 20:06:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2739/273889/273889_25.png一个搅动不安 发表于 2025-3-26 03:00:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2739/273889/273889_26.png诱拐 发表于 2025-3-26 05:34:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2739/273889/273889_27.pngSynthesize 发表于 2025-3-26 10:00:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2739/273889/273889_28.pngnonplus 发表于 2025-3-26 16:10:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2739/273889/273889_29.png上下倒置 发表于 2025-3-26 18:39:10
Chris Maniasrmer, he maintained, but imaginative power it surely lacked. Like Bentham, who sought “to pluck the mask of Mystery from the face of Jurisprudence” (Bentham 1977, 410), Holmes looked to careful analysis of law and the language used in it to expose fallacies of thought and practice.