Figate
发表于 2025-3-23 13:13:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270997/270997_11.png
Cpr951
发表于 2025-3-23 14:57:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270997/270997_12.png
tattle
发表于 2025-3-23 21:38:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270997/270997_13.png
ureter
发表于 2025-3-23 22:55:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270997/270997_14.png
MEN
发表于 2025-3-24 06:18:28
Charles Dickens: A Haunting (1960),lowing short ‘thinking aloud’; it is I suspect the only sort of critical contribution that a novelist, untrained in literary scholarship, can make which may justify his amateur intrusion — a contribution unashamedly subjective.
cluster
发表于 2025-3-24 07:29:12
In Defence of Dickens (1958),ay, Charlotte Brontë, George Eliot and Thomas Hardy. Chesterton’s prophecy has not yet come true. Modern critics are usually still analytic, self-conscious and descriptive in their treatment of literature, and they prefer the novels of George Eliot and Henry James, who possess these very same qualities, to the exuberant writings of Dickens.
adulterant
发表于 2025-3-24 12:59:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270997/270997_17.png
误传
发表于 2025-3-24 16:40:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270997/270997_18.png
Conquest
发表于 2025-3-24 20:55:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270997/270997_19.png
Monocle
发表于 2025-3-25 00:58:33
Epilogue (1952),laughed and derided and despised and hated; he never patronized or sniffed He could be desperately unhappy; he was never only bored. He had no fastidious shrinkings, no snobberies, no dogmatic rejections.