NOVA 发表于 2025-3-23 10:04:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270954/270954_11.pngLAITY 发表于 2025-3-23 17:02:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270954/270954_12.pngvocation 发表于 2025-3-23 20:29:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53127-0es of Diana are widely understood as making identity present, but there is much less agreement on the status and the significance of such processes of figuration. If indeed as Suzanne Moore has put it, ‘Diana became a blank screen available for all kinds of projection’,. an historical explanation ofmortuary 发表于 2025-3-23 22:30:11
Paul Frank,Michael Nurok,Thor Sundton representation in the foregoing has, to some extent deliberately, rubbed against the grain of the intense affective responses to Diana’s death and the exceptionalist readings of her significance they suggested, whether celebratory or dismissive or making abject. Situating ‘Diana’ with respect toLINE 发表于 2025-3-24 05:54:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270954/270954_15.pngGENRE 发表于 2025-3-24 09:19:53
http://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/270954.jpgEntrancing 发表于 2025-3-24 11:37:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270954/270954_17.png断言 发表于 2025-3-24 18:32:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270954/270954_18.pnglicence 发表于 2025-3-24 21:28:02
Historicizing the Signs of Diana,own the meaning of a princess. The word defines female identities through independent sovereignty (. 1.1; . 2) and by marriage (. 3). In each of these it stands at the conjunction of femininity and monarchy, though the latter can be understood metaphorically (. II.5.a), even so far as to imply meritJOT 发表于 2025-3-25 01:39:35
Diana, Royalty and Femininity,ng her against the monarchy. During the week of Diana’s funeral, the popular and broadsheet press placed the reaction to her death in opposition to the ‘Establishment’ and ‘tradition’ made visible in the royal family’s failure to make an adequate public response. This opposition was subsequently ela