宏伟
发表于 2025-3-23 13:37:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270924/270924_11.png
形容词
发表于 2025-3-23 17:09:56
Five Start-up Opportunities Analysed,Her distinctive notion of ‘vibrant matter’ invokes a new and different political imaginary outside the Hegelian and psychoanalytic framework of the subject and object/other relation. Bennett demonstrates that both human and nonhuman entities (including inorganic matter) are composed of ‘vibrant matt
冰河期
发表于 2025-3-23 21:29:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270924/270924_13.png
Ophthalmologist
发表于 2025-3-24 01:47:27
Theories on Crime in the United States,ct fitting together. I will then move onto questions about your most recent work on the ‘politics of becoming’ and the connections between your ideas and other approaches within contemporary political theory.
verdict
发表于 2025-3-24 06:00:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270924/270924_15.png
痛恨
发表于 2025-3-24 08:18:18
Knowing a Language: What Does it Mean?o this interview. To begin, ., which you co-authored with Charles Mills, came out in 2007. Perhaps, not everyone has had a chance to read this book, but it is safe to assume that most political theorists, and surely those working in contemporary political theory, have heard of and read . (hereafter
anatomical
发表于 2025-3-24 13:02:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270924/270924_17.png
摘要
发表于 2025-3-24 16:53:12
How to Study Global Christianityow and former Master of Trinity College, Cambridge. Best known for his work on social choice theory and development economics, his work over 50 years has spanned a great variety of subjects in economics and philosophy, including welfare economics, public health, gender studies, moral and political p
conference
发表于 2025-3-24 19:53:07
International Political Theoryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/270924.jpg
运气
发表于 2025-3-25 02:10:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6483-0This interview was conducted before Jerry Cohen’s death in August 2009. Simon Tormey: Jerry, many thanks for agreeing to be interviewed. I wonder if I could start by asking you about the project for which you are perhaps best known: analytical Marxism. What became of the project – and should we regard it as a success or a failure?