pulse-pressure
发表于 2025-3-28 17:35:57
Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justicehttp://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/270922.jpg
MEAN
发表于 2025-3-28 19:22:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270922/270922_42.png
发牢骚
发表于 2025-3-29 01:58:55
978-94-007-9812-0Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
comely
发表于 2025-3-29 06:41:03
1534-6781 lism and human rights can mutually reinforcing, de-legitimizHuman rights have transformed the way in which we conceive the place of the individual within the community and in relation to the state in a vast array of disciplines, including law, philosophy, politics, sociology, geography. The publishe
Chandelier
发表于 2025-3-29 07:46:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270922/270922_45.png
STEER
发表于 2025-3-29 12:42:50
Samiran Nundy,Atul Kakar,Zulfiqar A. Bhuttatinct conceptual propositions. A pluralistic understanding of universality, far from an oxymoron, offers a model in which regime fragmentation actually sustains universal values in a manner more effective than a unified regime grounded in nowhere in particular, if not nowhere at all.
打算
发表于 2025-3-29 16:46:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270922/270922_47.png
火车车轮
发表于 2025-3-29 23:43:22
How to Solve It: Modern Heuristicspproach stresses implementation rather than litigation, prevention rather than cure. It also demonstrates that social and economic rights are grounded in a number of intersecting legal regimes, as a disaggregated analysis cuts vertically though all levels of jurisdiction, involves multiple actors and engages a wide range of forms of normativity.
circumvent
发表于 2025-3-30 03:43:15
Zbigniew Michalewicz,David B. Fogelanipulation and subversion by states and communities. In this article, I theorize the process of translation and argue that anthropological analysis of translators helps to explain how human rights ideas and interventions circulate around the world and transform social life.
Nebulous
发表于 2025-3-30 06:10:01
Zbigniew Michalewicz,David B. Fogelries cannot be undone. This means that Indigenous peoples must figure out how to reconcile former decentralized legal orders and law with a centralized state and legal system. Any process of reconciliation must include political deliberation on the part of an informed and involved Indigenous citizenry.