inspiration
发表于 2025-3-25 03:42:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270918/270918_21.png
喷出
发表于 2025-3-25 09:13:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270918/270918_22.png
征服
发表于 2025-3-25 12:53:31
Critique, Construction, and Co-creation: A Conversation with Kenneth Gergen,en emphasizes the case that he has made, in his more recent writings, for a “reflective pragmatism” which means shifting attention away from questions about “why some descriptions of human action simply more accurate than others” to an examination of what values and meaning would serve society
血友病
发表于 2025-3-25 16:08:52
The Incorrigible Science: A Conversation with James Lamiell,mporary mainstream scientific psychology, that knowledge of statistical patterns in population-level data is knowledge that is also scientifically informative about the psychological lives of individual persons. Located at the nexus of the philosophy of psychology, the history of psychology, and res
苦恼
发表于 2025-3-25 23:22:18
Toward a Social Psychoanalysis: A Conversation with Lynne Layton,tical, and cultural processes to demonstrate that psychoanalysis often reproduces the very conditions that create the ills we wish to treat. Through her scholarship, Layton exposes the hidden moral and political discourses that live behind the technologies of the . and evidenced-based treatments and
辞职
发表于 2025-3-26 02:11:45
The Psychic Life of the Political: A Conversation with Derek Hook,prise psychological systems of knowledge. Through his scholarship, he observes the complex relationship between human desire and power as it continually forms and returns in the complex flow of political and psychological streams of human experience (Hook 2012a, b, c, 2013c, d). The interview with H
Morbid
发表于 2025-3-26 05:48:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270918/270918_27.png
encomiast
发表于 2025-3-26 10:10:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270918/270918_28.png
Projection
发表于 2025-3-26 12:50:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2710/270918/270918_29.png
Psa617
发表于 2025-3-26 18:59:33
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286566r is able to rectify some of Foucault’s cynicism. Gadamer’s embrace of dialogue assumes that interpretation does not proceed on the basis of a sovereign attitude, such as the proposed metaphysics of psychic structures that guide some classical models of psychoanalytic interpretation.