EWE
发表于 2025-3-23 10:57:29
Why Dialectics? Why Now?,mon (‘Goose From Off the Common Studies’, or G.F.C. for short) and that which studies those who steal the common from the goose (‘Common From the Goose Studies’, or C.F.G. for short). If the ‘mainstream’ in practically every discipline consists almost entirely of the former, Marxism is our leading example of the latter.
miniature
发表于 2025-3-23 14:52:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2709/270844/270844_12.png
奖牌
发表于 2025-3-23 22:04:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2709/270844/270844_13.png
群岛
发表于 2025-3-24 01:41:31
,Dialectics and Revolution: Trotsky, Lenin, Lukács,n instrument of knowledge and action. Let me try to illustrate the connection between dialectics and revolution in the thought of three distinct Marxist figures: Leon D. Trotsky, Vladimir I. Lenin and Georg Lukács.
补角
发表于 2025-3-24 02:28:37
Marxist Feminist Dialectics for the Twenty-first Century,e, gender, and sexuality, as well as class. The central issue I want to address here is that of what Marxist theory, especially the dialectical understanding of the world contained in that theory, can provide in the way of resources for contemporary analysis.
暖昧关系
发表于 2025-3-24 08:43:08
Marc P. E. André,Andreas Engertd Marxist phase, I could never make much sense of the negation of the negation or the interpenetration of opposites’. He could have added that hierarchy theory grasps some of the insights of ‘integrated levels’ or ‘overdetermination’.
annexation
发表于 2025-3-24 11:43:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2709/270844/270844_17.png
Androgen
发表于 2025-3-24 16:05:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2709/270844/270844_18.png
Landlocked
发表于 2025-3-24 20:35:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2709/270844/270844_19.png
allude
发表于 2025-3-24 23:55:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2709/270844/270844_20.png