阉割
发表于 2025-3-25 04:18:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3957-1argumentation; Legal Justification; Prolog
撕裂皮肉
发表于 2025-3-25 07:29:35
978-1-4020-0287-8Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999
vitreous-humor
发表于 2025-3-25 13:53:50
From law to DiaLaw,on. A few millennia later, from the beginning of the 1990s onwards to be exact, researchers involved in the field of AI & Law became interested in dialogical models of argumentation. By approaching argumentation dialogically the research on AI & Law followed in the footsteps of prominent researchers
Truculent
发表于 2025-3-25 18:03:36
DiaLaw,d. The game DiaLaw builds on the theory of legal argumentation developed over the years by Hage, Leenes and Lodder (Leenes, Lodder & Hage, 1994; Hage, Leenes & Lodder, 1994; Lodder, 1996a, 1996b, 1997b, 1997c), and was first presented in (Lodder & Herczog, 1995).
该得
发表于 2025-3-25 22:04:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270386/270386_25.png
咽下
发表于 2025-3-26 00:47:01
In conclusion,legal justification. Subsequently, the answers to the questions that were raised in the first chapter, and answered one by one in the course of this work, are summarized. Finally, the future use in legal practice of dialog models that represent argumentation in a natural way is discussed.
anticipate
发表于 2025-3-26 04:39:22
Book 1999and ‘structural‘ arguments is added, and different layers in argumentation models are discussed. Finally, in chapter 8 (the former chapter 7) is added a recapitulation of my view on legal justification, and a discussion on the future use in legal practice of dialog models that represent argumentatio
CURB
发表于 2025-3-26 09:07:59
1572-4395 ) is added a recapitulation of my view on legal justification, and a discussion on the future use in legal practice of dialog models that represent argumentatio978-1-4020-0287-8978-94-011-3957-1Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
PET-scan
发表于 2025-3-26 14:10:50
1572-4395 e Universiteit Maastricht. The chapters 1, 4 & 5 (now: 1, 5 & 6) of my dissertation have remained largely unaltered. In chapter 2 I added explicitly the distinction between constructing legal justification and reconstructing it, and tried to elucidate the differences (and similarities) between the p
Glycogen
发表于 2025-3-26 17:04:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2704/270386/270386_30.png