钢笔尖 发表于 2025-3-23 10:25:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2699/269845/269845_11.png担心 发表于 2025-3-23 16:18:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2699/269845/269845_12.pngaviator 发表于 2025-3-23 19:04:09
Trumponomics,n without much ideology but arguably a vision with sufficient potential for pragmatism and .. Theoretical and conceptual frameworks, including philosophical, political and economic perspectives, and Trump’s mercantilist groundings are articulated. It is argued that Trumponomics contrasts with the ‘tRodent 发表于 2025-3-23 22:54:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2699/269845/269845_14.png生气的边缘 发表于 2025-3-24 06:12:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2699/269845/269845_15.png抵押贷款 发表于 2025-3-24 06:33:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2699/269845/269845_16.png富足女人 发表于 2025-3-24 13:59:12
Trumponomics,phical, political and economic perspectives, and Trump’s mercantilist groundings are articulated. It is argued that Trumponomics contrasts with the ‘transformational diplomacy’ of previous USA administrations. Instead it is immersed in short-sighted ‘transactional diplomacy’, which will have a significant impact on the values of development aid.audiologist 发表于 2025-3-24 15:15:38
Michael A. Henning,Jan H. van Vuurenhe post-Washington Consensus is analysed providing a backdrop for the critique of economic globalisation as a development aid cornerstone. Trump’s rejection of the neoliberal globalisation agenda and departure from post-WWII ideologies is discussed.薄荷醇 发表于 2025-3-24 20:31:15
Book 2018landscape and the reasons for rejection of the political establishment, both under Trump and internationally. Next, it gives a historical-political overview of development aid in the post WW-II era and discusses the dominant Washington Consensus doctrine and its failure. It then provides a critique是限制 发表于 2025-3-25 01:43:07
2211-4548 t provoking and pioneering exposition of contemporary populi.This volume examines the impact of the Trump presidency on development aid. It starts out by describing the rise of national populism, the political landscape and the reasons for rejection of the political establishment, both under Trump a