艰苦地移动 发表于 2025-3-23 10:45:36
Robert Lickliter PhD,Lorraine E. Bahrick PhDit in the ., was geometrical rather than algebraic, its aim was certainty rather than discovery, and it did not discriminate between material and non-material reality. I will show how Descartes gradually expanded and radicalized his mathesis universalis.ARK 发表于 2025-3-23 15:24:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268264/268264_12.png通情达理 发表于 2025-3-23 21:05:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268264/268264_13.png扩音器 发表于 2025-3-23 23:38:08
Who Was Descartes?, to deal seriously with Descartes is at least once to engage in a meditation in which everything previously learned about Descartes is discarded in an effort to come to a clear idea of the nature of his mathematical talent.发展 发表于 2025-3-24 02:48:53
What is ,it in the ., was geometrical rather than algebraic, its aim was certainty rather than discovery, and it did not discriminate between material and non-material reality. I will show how Descartes gradually expanded and radicalized his mathesis universalis.opinionated 发表于 2025-3-24 10:24:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268264/268264_16.pngchastise 发表于 2025-3-24 11:01:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268264/268264_17.pngIbd810 发表于 2025-3-24 15:43:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268264/268264_18.pngalabaster 发表于 2025-3-24 21:36:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268264/268264_19.pngSurgeon 发表于 2025-3-24 23:36:10
,Arguments Showing that Descartes’ Physics is Mathematical,I would like to present four arguments in support of the thesis that Cartesian physics was a mathematical physics. The first two are historical, the other two of a systematic nature. I believe that together they form a compelling case for rehabilitating Cartesian physics as a mathematical physics.