PARA 发表于 2025-3-23 09:52:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268258/268258_11.pnghelper-T-cells 发表于 2025-3-23 15:54:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268258/268258_12.png送秋波 发表于 2025-3-23 22:06:09
Introduction,ea of free speech, understood as a performative act of testimony, which he extracts from a deconstructive reading of Kant’s . This sets the stage for the book’s interpretation of deconstruction as a philosophical practice that is embedded within the social-historical world, as opposed to constituting merely as a method of reading.放弃 发表于 2025-3-23 23:53:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268258/268258_14.pngOmniscient 发表于 2025-3-24 04:49:19
Ryan A. GustafsonProvides an accessible introduction to Derrida‘s social and political thought.Studies Derrida‘s writings on institutions from a philosophical perspective.Models how deconstruction can be useful for soABIDE 发表于 2025-3-24 07:12:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268258/268258_16.pngJADED 发表于 2025-3-24 13:25:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268258/268258_17.png扩大 发表于 2025-3-24 15:16:18
A. Lopata,D. Kohlman,I. Johnstonsocial-historical reflection. The book’s study of Derrida’s philosophy of institutions begins here because Derrida goes on to redeploy the notion of “historicity” that he finds in phenomenology in order to theorize social and political institutions in his later works. The chapter begins with a readiantecedence 发表于 2025-3-24 23:00:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268258/268258_19.pngDistribution 发表于 2025-3-25 00:53:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268258/268258_20.png