insipid
发表于 2025-3-25 05:10:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268252/268252_21.png
伙伴
发表于 2025-3-25 08:49:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268252/268252_22.png
符合你规定
发表于 2025-3-25 13:24:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268252/268252_23.png
LARK
发表于 2025-3-25 17:47:27
A. Herbert Fritz,Günter Schulzercise of the art it mimics. Yet, to be successful as parody, it must provide sufficient clues for the discerning reader to grasp its satirical character. Otherwise, it remains an undetected, therefore unappreciated, hoax.
无价值
发表于 2025-3-25 20:26:58
A. Herbert Fritz,Günter Schulzewhy discuss deconstruction at all? Deconstruction is, after all, a part of the “post-modernist contribution” that, according to an article in a recent academic journal, is itself nothing more that “a spectacular PR maneuver” that has “succeeded in repackaging and marketing—especially in English Depa
fluffy
发表于 2025-3-26 03:02:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268252/268252_26.png
遗留之物
发表于 2025-3-26 05:45:56
A. Herbert Fritz,Günter Schulzenting to understand him—none, for instance, claim to do anything as extraordinary as “deconstruction”—none adhere to one of the most basic hermeneutical rules: reconstruct the context. Because critics neglect the context, some charge Derrida with interpreting Husserlian phenomenology merely as ontol
Flatter
发表于 2025-3-26 11:34:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268252/268252_28.png
巨硕
发表于 2025-3-26 13:51:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268252/268252_29.png
干涉
发表于 2025-3-26 20:28:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268252/268252_30.png