OPINE 发表于 2025-3-25 05:40:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2658/265745/265745_21.png刺耳的声音 发表于 2025-3-25 08:27:38
The Concept of MindLet us assume, as is common, that a general account of what it is to have a mind must be stated in terms of intentionality and consciousness. Such an account may go like this:Mutter 发表于 2025-3-25 13:10:00
Pragya Tekade,Ghanshyam Prasad Dubeyamples, but masses (heaps of sand, pools of water, etc.) also seem to make good particulars. Scattered groups (such as soccer teams), processes (such as light beams or pressure waves), wave/particles (such as electrons and photons) and fields (such as magnetic or gravitational fields) may be more coMystic 发表于 2025-3-25 19:52:41
Xiaohan Guo,Haizhou Du,Weina Zhang a consequence, making something happen, or making it the case that; influencing, affecting, doing something to, or making a difference to something. All very obvious, but only to those who already understand what causing is. But now try to explain what causality, or causation, is in terms that do nblackout 发表于 2025-3-25 21:15:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2658/265745/265745_25.pngsynovitis 发表于 2025-3-26 04:10:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2658/265745/265745_26.png歪曲道理 发表于 2025-3-26 04:18:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2658/265745/265745_27.pngconflate 发表于 2025-3-26 09:35:16
Xiong Wan,Yuxi Sun,Yanqing Wang,Meng Xiaructure as its circumstantially necessary condition) we have reached a point where we can address the first of the five problems of mental causation, described in the Introduction: the problem of mental anomalism. The problem was that .亲密 发表于 2025-3-26 14:20:46
Speech Emotion Recognition Using U-Netat-times) as well as of physical connection in and among particulars (mostly objects). On that account, . causation can be expected to be a matter of counterfactual dependence involving mental states as well as of physical connection involving a minded actor. But physical connections are indeed justType-1-Diabetes 发表于 2025-3-26 19:05:46
Xiaohua Ke,Binglong Li,Zexian Ou,Xiaobo Wud for, ontologically speaking.. Most philosphers go along with common sense in holding that events are spatiotemporally situated items that happen, or occur.. But beyond that minimal assumption there is hardly any consensus to be found in the literature on this subject. I would like to start my disc