Ceramic 发表于 2025-3-30 08:57:17

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95979-9 affiliation with particular social groups. In addition, we will observe those differences between authoritarian and nonauthoritarian adolescents that throw some light on one’s identification with particular groups on the one hand and intolerance toward other groups (as a corollary effect) on the other.

AND 发表于 2025-3-30 14:52:24

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265196/265196_52.png

etiquette 发表于 2025-3-30 18:56:54

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265196/265196_53.png

EXALT 发表于 2025-3-30 21:15:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265196/265196_54.png

事与愿违 发表于 2025-3-31 01:34:01

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265196/265196_55.png

Negotiate 发表于 2025-3-31 08:10:50

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6733-5l and antidemocratic political regimes. There were four levels of analysis. 1) Cross-national authoritarianism — the first problem investigated asked: Are there any measures of authoritarianism that are predictably different for different countries? If so, why do these differences exist? For this pu
页: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Democracy, Socialization and Conflicting Loyalties in East and West; Cross-National and C Russell F. Farnen (Director and Professor of Poli