dainty 发表于 2025-3-25 07:02:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265188/265188_21.png假设 发表于 2025-3-25 07:29:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-02241-1 (if such is possible) an indisputable description. A very brief beginning to a definition is that the public good embraces integrity, honesty, ethics, justice, and freedom. Of course, each of the components requires some explication. Integrity, which carries connotations of honor and virtue, also cjet-lag 发表于 2025-3-25 12:22:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04291-2d; every television network, every newspaper, and every blogger can throw up collective hands and plead overload. They can add another caveat as well; readers cannot possibly pay attention to everything. If they want to lend some credence to the claim, they can cite cognitive load theory (although tSpartan 发表于 2025-3-25 19:53:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81704-4hapter details, there are absences of detail or reportage as well as misinformation and disinformation. All the examples belie a dishonesty or a failure of truthfulness; in short, the instances show that the public good is ignored or violated by the inadvertent or (worse) the deliberate falseness thFLUSH 发表于 2025-3-25 22:29:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265188/265188_25.png杠杆 发表于 2025-3-26 02:52:10
Book 2015Examining essential aspects of American life, John Budd investigates how informational sources (print and broadcast media and other resources) fall short when it comes to informing citizens, failing our democracy and damaging the public good.盲信者 发表于 2025-3-26 05:16:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265188/265188_27.png砍伐 发表于 2025-3-26 11:29:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265188/265188_28.pngIge326 发表于 2025-3-26 15:24:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265188/265188_29.png跟随 发表于 2025-3-26 18:46:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265188/265188_30.png