发酵剂 发表于 2025-3-28 18:32:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265174/265174_41.pngpuzzle 发表于 2025-3-28 19:07:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265174/265174_42.pngAlbumin 发表于 2025-3-28 23:09:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265174/265174_43.png建筑师 发表于 2025-3-29 07:05:18
Introductionwing upon a wide range of philosophical, historical, and sociological points of view. The authors arrive at no firm consensus on the matter. Indeed, there is considerable disagreement among them about which ideas, arguments, and theoretical positions offer the most fruitful results. Their common groOcclusion 发表于 2025-3-29 11:14:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265174/265174_45.png高射炮 发表于 2025-3-29 11:59:33
Autonomous Technology, Democracy, and the Nimbysuman direction.”. From this standpoint, meeting the demands of technology and its attendant organizations, institutions, and ideology has become the primary goal of society. Instead of technology serving social ends, society has been put in service of technology. Unlike Jacques Ellul, who regards te初学者 发表于 2025-3-29 18:31:02
Technology, Bayesian Policymaking, and Democratic Processe little or no account of the hazard evaluations of laypersons most likely to be harmed by a risky technology. Instead, assessors usually assume that experts, rather than the people, have the right to define which risks are rationally acceptable.obstinate 发表于 2025-3-29 20:40:22
Instrumentalists and Expressivists: Ambiguous Links between Technology and Democracy than the democratic drive toward equality.. To a degree he could not have imagined, that democratic drive has been progressively embodied in technology. It thus appears that de Tocqueville’s predictions concerning equality have been realized, in that, to a significant degree, ours is a democracy ofexpound 发表于 2025-3-30 00:01:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265174/265174_49.pngexpansive 发表于 2025-3-30 06:30:08
Heidegger on Technology and Democracy Farias’s study of Heidegger and Nazism, is the fact that, after all the qualifications and interpretation, this important German thinker was deeply and irrevocably committed to one of the most antidemocratic movements of this or any other historical moment..