Arctic
发表于 2025-3-25 06:30:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2650/264961/264961_21.png
奴才
发表于 2025-3-25 07:56:19
,Introduction: Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson — Rhizomatic Connections,both ends of the twentieth century. At the start of the century Bergson’s thought was hailed as ‘the beginning of a new era’ and yet, under the weight of criticisms which labelled his thought ‘intuitionist’ or ‘irrationalist’, he virtually disappeared for most of the middle decades of the twentieth
humectant
发表于 2025-3-25 11:43:14
Thinking with Deleuze and Whitehead: a Double Test,rison. Comparison always entails the risk of reducing philosophical thoughts to a matter of opinions to be compared from an outside, apparently neutral, standpoint, that is by an unmoved reader, and this risk becomes lethal when, as is the case with both Whitehead and Deleuze, the philosophers expli
ACRID
发表于 2025-3-25 18:29:44
Language, Subjectivity and Individuality,tivity that is not limited to the ‘human’. Both writers provide compelling reasons as to why and how contemporary analyses should avoid positing the human person as either an object or a subject. Rather, ‘human’ individuality is to be envisaged as an aspect within the wider, processual effectivity w
Biguanides
发表于 2025-3-25 23:48:38
Whitehead and Deleuze: Thinking the Event,the ‘event’. It is a concept we are all familiar with in a sense, even in philosophy, since it is so central to much of contemporary thought. It plays, for instance, a central role in Whitehead’s process philosophy, but it is also a key concept for postmodern philosophers like Jacques Derrida and Je
合群
发表于 2025-3-26 03:22:26
The Emergence of a Speculative Empiricism: Whitehead Reading Bergson, William James, and John Dewey.’. There are many readers, particularly in France, who have seen this as attesting to a continuity between the two philosophers.. This impression seems all the more justified given the similar homage Whitehead had earlier paid Bergson in .: ‘I believe that in this doct
FLOUR
发表于 2025-3-26 07:41:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2650/264961/264961_27.png
abolish
发表于 2025-3-26 09:49:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2650/264961/264961_28.png
神圣在玷污
发表于 2025-3-26 13:06:53
Deleuze, Whitehead and the Reversal of Platonism, has been at least one of the primary questions of ‘modern’ philosophy and arguably . question of philosophy in the twentieth century on both sides of the professional divide, informing the questions of language, temporality and other topics. It has also been suggested that the claim regarding the ‘
defray
发表于 2025-3-26 19:31:25
A Whiteheadian Chaosmos?,nction between a cosmology and a chaosmology. At its most simplistic, the difference in play is that between a cosmos in which order is imposed on a primordial chaos ‘from outside’, or transcendently (as when Form is imposed on matter by the Platonic demiurge, or harmony established . by the Leibniz