脊椎动物 发表于 2025-3-23 13:08:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2649/264815/264815_11.pngconscience 发表于 2025-3-23 14:39:14
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89521-9ributes to economic efficiency. First, we derive the condition under which the current public debt can be redeemed by refinancing government bonds. This means that there is the limit to government bonds issued, and if they exceed the maximum, it will not be possible for the government to repay the cindicate 发表于 2025-3-23 20:58:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89521-9pact of fiscal policy on prices (Question 1) and the macro analysis of MMT (Question 2) are conducted by the mechanism by which government bonds are settled on the monetary base. On the other hand, in the answer to Question 3, public debt is analyzed on the assumption that government bonds and the m垄断 发表于 2025-3-23 22:39:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2649/264815/264815_14.pnggraphy 发表于 2025-3-24 05:01:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2649/264815/264815_15.png灌溉 发表于 2025-3-24 09:12:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2649/264815/264815_16.pngBANAL 发表于 2025-3-24 13:50:12
Book 2024s (i) what mechanisms exist for fiscal policy and the price level, (ii) whether the MMT proposition that public deficits increase people’s wealth and savings fits into the standard macro model, and (iii) whether Blanchard‘s assertion that fiscal deficits are net wealth in the US economy can be appliCLASP 发表于 2025-3-24 17:56:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2649/264815/264815_18.png杠杆 发表于 2025-3-24 21:46:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89521-9onetary base are the same. However, government bonds are IOUs that do not have finality while the monetary base issued by the central bank have finality. Therefore, from the viewpoint of the economics of payments, the analysis of public debt by distinguishing between government bonds and the monetary base will be an issue for the future.HILAR 发表于 2025-3-25 02:36:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89521-9n’s Ricardian type argument the so-called Crocodile Mouth theory, and Blanchard’s non-Ricardian type of government have been understood as independent economic perceptions, but they will be shown as a theoretically coherent story.