fender
发表于 2025-3-25 04:12:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2649/264807/264807_21.png
多产子
发表于 2025-3-25 08:51:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0jection of analyticity still prevails — in that philosophers . have either joined Quine in repudiating the “analytic”/“synthetic” distinction or remained (however mutinously) silent and made no claims of analyticity.
AMEND
发表于 2025-3-25 11:55:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0neralizations. Traditional accounts of definability are often vague and obscure, however, so that it is not always clear what the word stands for. Hence, it is instructive to place definitions in a more formal framework, as we shall see. Such a maneuvre brings forth sophistication which is not pract
Gentry
发表于 2025-3-25 17:42:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0ne-place predicate .) occurring in a theory .[.] is . on the basis of this theory iff the theory determines the interpretation of . as soon as the interpretations of the other concepts occurring in .[.] are fixed. More explicit, this is what, the definability of . on the basis of .[.] means.
胆小鬼
发表于 2025-3-25 23:42:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2649/264807/264807_25.png
fructose
发表于 2025-3-26 03:13:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2649/264807/264807_26.png
Seizure
发表于 2025-3-26 06:51:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2371-0ivalence of any notion in the vocabulary of physics or some other “hard science.” Various “naturalistic” accounts make use of . notions, since idealized notions are used in physics. The most sophisticated use made of idealized notions in articulating a naturalistic philosophy is by W. V. Quine. In h
TRUST
发表于 2025-3-26 11:54:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2649/264807/264807_28.png
Esalate
发表于 2025-3-26 16:27:48
Definition in a Quinean Worldjection of analyticity still prevails — in that philosophers . have either joined Quine in repudiating the “analytic”/“synthetic” distinction or remained (however mutinously) silent and made no claims of analyticity.
Osteons
发表于 2025-3-26 17:42:26
Towards a General Theory of Identifiabilityne-place predicate .) occurring in a theory .[.] is . on the basis of this theory iff the theory determines the interpretation of . as soon as the interpretations of the other concepts occurring in .[.] are fixed. More explicit, this is what, the definability of . on the basis of .[.] means.