松紧带 发表于 2025-3-27 01:01:57
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137479358crime; law; Nation; objectivity; research惊惶 发表于 2025-3-27 04:07:51
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2015GIDDY 发表于 2025-3-27 06:35:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264781/264781_33.png继而发生 发表于 2025-3-27 11:32:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264781/264781_34.pngmodest 发表于 2025-3-27 15:41:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264781/264781_35.pngelastic 发表于 2025-3-27 18:32:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92860-4s different from a scientific concept and measure. We have explored some of the initial issues related to the intersection of the criminal- law definition of crime and science in our discussion of the objectivity of the criminal- law definition of crime in Chapter 3. In this chapter, we turn our atttic-douloureux 发表于 2025-3-28 00:40:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92860-4e individual— that is, criminology is strongly associated with and influenced by microlevel studies of crime that direct attention to locating the causes of crime within an individual’s psychology or biology or their individual relationships to others and to social institutions. The assumption thatMILL 发表于 2025-3-28 06:10:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92860-4ch, criminologists who write about the causes of crime may not always be referring to the criminal- law definition of crime— and because notions of crime vary across time and space, this is certainly understandable. As a result, criminolo-gists must pay attention to metaphysical issues (Dupre 1995;gene-therapy 发表于 2025-3-28 10:07:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92860-4independent of the criminal law. We will refer to this definition as the criminological definition of crime (CDC) and hope to develop an analysis that leads to the creation of an independent definition of crime that has scientific utility. This definition is criminological because it is derived indeopportune 发表于 2025-3-28 13:59:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92860-4 what we see as major problems in criminology that are a result of when crimi-nologists simply accept the criminal- law definition of crime. First, as we have argued, criminologists tend to assess hypotheses in ways where they are not likely to be rejected, and instead of rejecting weak results, the