Obstreperous 发表于 2025-3-26 23:34:04
Deterrence, Consensus and Reassurance in the Defence of Europe, spending a few moments in casting a backward look over the origins and development of the Western Alliance to see how we have got to where we are now. There is little point in considering where we should be going if we do not first decide where we are starting from.粗语 发表于 2025-3-27 01:11:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264742/264742_32.pngObligatory 发表于 2025-3-27 09:04:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264742/264742_33.pngHyperopia 发表于 2025-3-27 10:13:19
,Broadening the Strategic Focus: Comments on Michael Howard’s Paper, Paper. How . we ever get along without it? We surely will get along in the future only by making good use of it. It is the central contribution of an absolutely first-rate Paper, which is throughout original in thought, elegant in phrasing, and penetrating in analysis.Adulate 发表于 2025-3-27 14:48:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71307-1ncing defence policies, doctrines and burdens. This is one reason why the subject has generally been unexplored in traditional strategic studies. The other is that, as long as domestic consensus on these matters existed, there was no real pressure to address them; that idyllic state of affairs no longer exists.有组织 发表于 2025-3-27 19:47:33
Charles Van Valkenburg,Hagop S. Akiskalers, ecologists, and other cause-adopters. Many middle-aged, middle-class, conservative Europeans have also joined. Especially among the Protestant churches, leaders have condemned in ethical and religious terms the development and possession of nuclear weapons, nuclear deployments, nuclear strategy and nuclear deterrence.recede 发表于 2025-3-28 00:56:24
Brenna N. Renn,Samantha E. John Paper. How . we ever get along without it? We surely will get along in the future only by making good use of it. It is the central contribution of an absolutely first-rate Paper, which is throughout original in thought, elegant in phrasing, and penetrating in analysis.BUOY 发表于 2025-3-28 04:42:33
Introduction,82. It was a conference devoted to one of the most ambiguous, imprecise and elusive aspects of security: that of the domestic political factors influencing defence policies, doctrines and burdens. This is one reason why the subject has generally been unexplored in traditional strategic studies. The苍白 发表于 2025-3-28 08:11:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264742/264742_39.pngrecession 发表于 2025-3-28 11:23:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264742/264742_40.png