Dri727 发表于 2025-3-25 06:25:55
d new and have been specially commissioned for this volume.Deconstructions: A User‘s Guide. is a new and unusual kind of book. At once a reference work and a series of inventive essays opening up new directions for deconstruction, it is intended as an authoritative and indispensable guide. With a he使满足 发表于 2025-3-25 09:52:41
Kurt Th. Friedlaender Dr. Jur. Etrer. Pol.any sense. This distinction between two primary modes of discourse, fictional and nonfictional, has often been made since Sidney’s day, and it operates strongly in much thinking about language use in our own time.Semblance 发表于 2025-3-25 12:50:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264493/264493_23.pngmonologue 发表于 2025-3-25 16:36:02
Informationssystem für Perspektivplanungof the masters, even if to destabilize it. The institutionalization of Cultural Studies has something like a relationship with the missed crossings between errant tendencies. This essay runs after them, necessarily in vain.赤字 发表于 2025-3-25 22:55:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44707-9to market. It is such contingencies as these which determine whether drugs intoxicate, narcotize, energize, silence, make a person withdrawn and dreamy, talk their head off, suffer genital retraction or an inconsolable erection or just go plain crazy.节约 发表于 2025-3-26 02:05:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264493/264493_26.pngCUB 发表于 2025-3-26 06:34:43
Deconstruction and Cultural Studies: Arguments for a Deconstructive Cultural Studies,of the masters, even if to destabilize it. The institutionalization of Cultural Studies has something like a relationship with the missed crossings between errant tendencies. This essay runs after them, necessarily in vain.Androgen 发表于 2025-3-26 09:42:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264493/264493_28.png助记 发表于 2025-3-26 16:08:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264493/264493_29.pngInculcate 发表于 2025-3-26 18:37:35
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20180-9e of the man be taken by an ‘intelligent’ machine. The game remains the same, but the role of the judge is now to decide which of the players is human. Turing proposed the imitation game as a pragmatic way to deal with the question ‘can machines think?’ It has long been known as the Turing test.