冬眠 发表于 2025-3-25 04:26:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264450/264450_21.png分开如此和谐 发表于 2025-3-25 11:09:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264450/264450_22.png准则 发表于 2025-3-25 14:29:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264450/264450_23.png厌食症 发表于 2025-3-25 17:15:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264450/264450_24.pngoccult 发表于 2025-3-25 21:19:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264450/264450_25.pngadroit 发表于 2025-3-26 02:56:59
P. Uhrmeister,F. J. Ferstl,U. Blumf IR at the level of meta-theory. This attempt has been situated on the exploration of a semantic conceptualization for theorizing the phenomenon of ‘international’ that can go beyond Western epistemology’s fundamentalism involving the accentuation on post-enlightenment reason and the normative exemplars of modernity.Ptosis 发表于 2025-3-26 06:53:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59924-8scurrettes, 2020, p. 1). Such a thrust on the significance of the debate on order building for the technical discourse of the discipline of International Relations tends to have received a distinct epistemic treatment.PAN 发表于 2025-3-26 08:55:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04185-2mapping the working of international relations in postcolonial societies. In pursuit of unpacking answers for this question, the chapter engages with the task of an epistemological reassessment of the existing body of literature on the level-of-analysis-problem in International Relations. Taking int商谈 发表于 2025-3-26 13:30:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92575-7 agents and the system structure. Such theories are imperative for the purpose of explaining State action (Wendt in International Organization, 41, 1987, p. 365). Similarly, invoking Kenneth Waltz (., p. 340), Justin Rosenberg advocates the need for delineating the modes for uniting the distinct theLice692 发表于 2025-3-26 20:52:59
P. Uhrmeister,F. J. Ferstl,U. Blumf IR at the level of meta-theory. This attempt has been situated on the exploration of a semantic conceptualization for theorizing the phenomenon of ‘international’ that can go beyond Western epistemology’s fundamentalism involving the accentuation on post-enlightenment reason and the normative exem