信徒
发表于 2025-3-25 05:34:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264426/264426_21.png
Cholesterol
发表于 2025-3-25 10:09:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264426/264426_22.png
Integrate
发表于 2025-3-25 14:46:55
Mathias Hildebrandt,Manfred Brockernot the Crown. Kenrick shows how Rhodesia initially followed the route of a loyal rebellion, but was forced by its defence of white-minority rule to abandon the Queen and declare a republic in 1970. The chapter shows how, by disavowing the British Monarchy, Rhodesia became more like the non-settler colonies it criticised.
厚脸皮
发表于 2025-3-25 17:25:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264426/264426_24.png
灌输
发表于 2025-3-25 22:12:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264426/264426_25.png
感情
发表于 2025-3-26 04:09:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2645/264426/264426_26.png
TRUST
发表于 2025-3-26 07:29:13
McKinseyisierung des Asylverfahrenst’s internal settlement with black nationalists and the approach of majority rule. The chapter uses news media and legislative assembly debates to consider how the settler portrayal of Africans as ‘unchanging’ was often highly contingent and dependent upon circumstance.
hair-bulb
发表于 2025-3-26 10:49:08
McKinseyisierung des Asylverfahrensmilitarism upon societies. It positions Rhodesia at a nexus between settler and non-settler colonies and considers the wider implications of the Rhodesian case study for our understandings of decolonisation, nationalism, and white identity both in the past and in the present day.
convert
发表于 2025-3-26 13:38:16
Introduction,ation in the febrile environment of late twentieth-century decolonisation. Kenrick also explores the implications of decolonisation in settler societies upon Britain and the resonances that these historical events have in the present day.
继而发生
发表于 2025-3-26 17:59:03
,These Colours Don’t Fade: Changing Rhodesia’s Flag, 1967–1968, independence was not anomalous, but part of wider global trends taking place in other settler societies such as Canada and South Africa. The chapter first looks at the cabinet documents of the committee that selected a new flag and then moves to consider how the new design was received in Parliament and the national media.