NAVEN 发表于 2025-3-23 09:54:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264098/264098_11.png谄媚于性 发表于 2025-3-23 14:43:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264098/264098_12.pngFacilities 发表于 2025-3-23 19:27:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264098/264098_13.pngRotator-Cuff 发表于 2025-3-24 00:17:08
Decadent Forms: Parnassus in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,later Ford Madox Ford) writes that in 1914 the Modernists ‘plotted the blowing of Parnassus to the moon’.. And for all the recent scholarly attention devoted to re- evaluating Decadence, there is still a lingering unease about its forms. While much of the scholarship in recent years has explored the运动吧 发表于 2025-3-24 03:45:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264098/264098_15.pngouter-ear 发表于 2025-3-24 07:28:35
In Praise of Decadence: The Epideictic Mode from Baudelaire to Wilde,he contrary.’. Twentieth-century critics such as Jonathan Dollimore have revised this judgment, casting decadent deviation as a subver- sive counter-cultural strategy. Oscar Wilde’s epigrammatic inversions of received wisdom, for example, anticipate deconstructive rewritings of binary oppositions: ‘铁砧 发表于 2025-3-24 10:46:25
Another Renaissance: The Decadent Poetic Drama of A. C. Swinburne and Michael Field,nt on, ‘we lose our hold on the present; but so far as there was any dramatic tradition in Shelley’s day there was nothing worth keeping. There is all the difference between preservation and restoration.’. The essay then moved on to discuss the reasons why Elizabethan poetic drama had been and still沉着 发表于 2025-3-24 14:59:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264098/264098_18.pngConstant 发表于 2025-3-24 21:21:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264098/264098_19.pngImmortal 发表于 2025-3-25 02:55:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264098/264098_20.png