编辑才信任 发表于 2025-3-27 00:51:57

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264045/264045_31.png

压倒性胜利 发表于 2025-3-27 01:35:29

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264045/264045_32.png

preservative 发表于 2025-3-27 05:50:44

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264045/264045_33.png

bibliophile 发表于 2025-3-27 11:37:46

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264045/264045_34.png

补充 发表于 2025-3-27 14:40:04

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264045/264045_35.png

合群 发表于 2025-3-27 20:41:25

Formats of Parliamentary Debate About the European Union,mblée Nationale, the German Bundestag, the British House of Commons, and the Austrian Nationalrat. This selection of cases includes a considerable degree of variation in the institutional and party political context of parliamentary interactions, resulting in different styles of debate. The task of

注意力集中 发表于 2025-3-27 23:58:34

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264045/264045_37.png

Tinea-Capitis 发表于 2025-3-28 05:26:38

The Polarization of Parliamentary Parties,cision-making through public claims-making on the one hand, and the polarization between parliamentary parties through expressed differences in their positions toward issues of European integration, on the other. Building on the findings of the previous chapter, this part of our analysis aims at the

Interim 发表于 2025-3-28 07:43:43

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264045/264045_39.png

难取悦 发表于 2025-3-28 11:51:18

http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264045/264045_40.png
页: 1 2 3 [4] 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Debating Europe in National Parliaments; Public Justification Frank Wendler Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016