Pert敏捷
发表于 2025-3-30 10:43:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264028/264028_51.png
遭受
发表于 2025-3-30 12:49:02
Comparing the Veritistic Dynamics of Four Proponent-Specific Argumentation Strategies in Dualistic Dates with two proponents and examine how thetruth-conduciveness of controversial argumentation depends on the strategies chosen by the proponents. In the next chapter, we will extend this analysis to multiproponent debates.
技术
发表于 2025-3-30 19:14:23
The Veritistic Dynamics of Debates with Core Argumentation a proponent to maximize the degree of justification of her core position (see Chap. 9). One of our chief interests consists in investigating whether a core position’s robustness remains an accurate indicator of truth when proponents employ the sophisticated argumentation strategies.
启发
发表于 2025-3-30 22:01:36
Linda E. Dankworth,Ann R. Daviderential density and initial agreement typically generate a full consensus. A more detailed analysis of the simulation uncovers that the dynamic geometry of the space of coherent positions exerts a pivotal influence on consensus evolution in a debate.
nullify
发表于 2025-3-31 01:39:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95699-2. The corroborating findings are spread all over Part II. So, Sect. . links the condensed results reported in the general introduction to the specific simulation studies and analyses carried out in Part II.
IRK
发表于 2025-3-31 07:33:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264028/264028_56.png
anagen
发表于 2025-3-31 11:10:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264028/264028_57.png
coltish
发表于 2025-3-31 15:45:00
Introduction to Part II. The corroborating findings are spread all over Part II. So, Sect. . links the condensed results reported in the general introduction to the specific simulation studies and analyses carried out in Part II.
Servile
发表于 2025-3-31 19:31:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264028/264028_59.png
厨师
发表于 2025-3-31 22:10:50
0166-6991 etical implications of truth- and consensus-conduciveness ofIs critical argumentation an effective way to overcome disagreement? And does the exchange of arguments bring opponents in a controversy closer to the truth? This study provides a new perspective on these pivotal questions. By means of mult