使增至最大 发表于 2025-4-1 03:49:41
Languageay 1972). For the most part, however, appraisals tend to agree with Julius Novick’s, that the dialogue ‘feels’ historically accurate and ‘can rise at times to a considerable level of eloquence’ (., 4 May 1972). English reviewers were more fulsome in their praise of the play’s language before their AChameleon 发表于 2025-4-1 09:14:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2641/264013/264013_62.pnginsomnia 发表于 2025-4-1 13:13:04
Charactersprotagonist, John Proctor exemplifies the tensions between self-preservation and integrity. At first, Elizabeth is so unforgiving and unyielding that integrity about her marriage becomes a vice; later, she admits her own complicity in her husband’s deed. Lacking integrity, Abigail accuses others inopportune 发表于 2025-4-1 15:49:11
Dramatic Structuretle exposition at the start. The play divides into two parts, each with two acts. Both involve integrity, which dominates the second part, wherein Proctor confesses to adultery, the private sin (Act III), and denies witchcraft, the public sin (Act IV). Despite the fusion of private and public sphererheumatism 发表于 2025-4-1 20:11:59
Tragedy?evin puns on Aristotle’s .: it ‘tells with terror and pitilessness the story of one of the most terrible and pitiless aberrations mankind has ever suffered’ (., 20 Jan. 1965). To John Gassner, Proctor has greater tragic stature than Willy Loman, and his death ‘is on an obviously higher level of tragGlucocorticoids 发表于 2025-4-2 01:39:35
Introduction: ‘the actor’s appearance on the stage in normal human guise leads us to expect a realistic treatment’ (Introduction to .). For example, when Miller redirected . six months after it first opened, at the same theatre, he replaced the pictorially realistic log cabin set with black curtains; but the ac