papyrus
发表于 2025-3-21 16:42:54
书目名称De Motu and the Analyst影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0263889<br><br> <br><br>书目名称De Motu and the Analyst影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0263889<br><br> <br><br>书目名称De Motu and the Analyst网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0263889<br><br> <br><br>书目名称De Motu and the Analyst网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0263889<br><br> <br><br>书目名称De Motu and the Analyst被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0263889<br><br> <br><br>书目名称De Motu and the Analyst被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0263889<br><br> <br><br>书目名称De Motu and the Analyst年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0263889<br><br> <br><br>书目名称De Motu and the Analyst年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0263889<br><br> <br><br>书目名称De Motu and the Analyst读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0263889<br><br> <br><br>书目名称De Motu and the Analyst读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0263889<br><br> <br><br>
opprobrious
发表于 2025-3-21 20:22:25
DE MOTU; sive De Motus Principio & Natura, et de Caufa Communicationis Motuum id quidem haud adeo difficile videtur, in rebus præsertim Physicis tractandis, ubi locum habent sensus, experientia, & ratiocinium geometricum. Seposito igitur, quantum licet, omni præjudicio, tam à loquendi consuetudine, quam à philosophorum auctoritate nato, ipsa rerum natura diligenter inspicien
天然热喷泉
发表于 2025-3-22 02:12:52
DE MOTU; or On the Principle and Nature of Motion, And on the Cause of the Communication of Motions few heed the warning. Nevertheless this hardly seems so difficult in matters principally treated by physicists, where sense, experience, and geometrical reasoning have their place. And so setting aside, as much as possible, all prejudice, whether originating in habit of speech or the authority of p
incubus
发表于 2025-3-22 04:38:01
Editor’s Introductionideration. The reasons for this relative neglect are no doubt complex, but part of the problem seems to be that . is a critique of seventeenth and eighteenth-century mathematical theories which are not generally well-known to contemporary historians of philosophy. Nevertheless, once the fundamental
大火
发表于 2025-3-22 09:55:10
The Analystour peculiar Study; nor to the Authority that you therefore assume in things foreign to your Profession, nor to the Abuse that you, and too many more of the like Character, are known to make of such undue Authority, to the misleading of unwary Persons in matters of the highest Concernment, and where
altruism
发表于 2025-3-22 15:29:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2639/263889/263889_6.png
altruism
发表于 2025-3-22 17:25:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2639/263889/263889_7.png
意见一致
发表于 2025-3-22 23:40:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2639/263889/263889_8.png
冷淡一切
发表于 2025-3-23 02:41:15
Editor’s Introductionces, and we cannot be certain whether it was ever submitted.. Despite the apparent failure of the essay to win favor in Paris, Berkeley thought highly enough of it to publish . in London in 1721, but again it failed to arouse interest in scientific and philosophical circles.
crucial
发表于 2025-3-23 05:43:42
The Analyst of you, Gentlemen, who are presumed to be of all Men the greatest Masters of Reason, to be most conversant about distinct Ideas, and never to take things upon trust, but always clearly to see your way, as Men whose constant Employment is the deducing Truth by the justest inference from the most evi