Encounter
发表于 2025-3-21 17:20:13
书目名称David Ricardo影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0263866<br><br> <br><br>书目名称David Ricardo影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0263866<br><br> <br><br>书目名称David Ricardo网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0263866<br><br> <br><br>书目名称David Ricardo网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0263866<br><br> <br><br>书目名称David Ricardo被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0263866<br><br> <br><br>书目名称David Ricardo被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0263866<br><br> <br><br>书目名称David Ricardo年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0263866<br><br> <br><br>书目名称David Ricardo年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0263866<br><br> <br><br>书目名称David Ricardo读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0263866<br><br> <br><br>书目名称David Ricardo读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0263866<br><br> <br><br>
反叛者
发表于 2025-3-22 00:18:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2639/263866/263866_2.png
变异
发表于 2025-3-22 04:08:46
2662-6276 f the secondary literature on Ricardo down to 2012, and discusses alternative perspectives on his work, including those of Marxians, neoclassicals and Sraffians.978-1-349-33116-1978-1-137-31595-3Series ISSN 2662-6276 Series E-ISSN 2662-6284
同音
发表于 2025-3-22 06:05:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2639/263866/263866_4.png
Irrepressible
发表于 2025-3-22 12:13:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2639/263866/263866_5.png
osculate
发表于 2025-3-22 14:13:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2639/263866/263866_6.png
osculate
发表于 2025-3-22 18:18:00
The Three Ricardos,h in generalisations about the history of economic thought’ (Hutchison 1952, p. 417). Hutchison distinguished three guilty parties — Mercantilist-Keynesians, Marxians and neoclassicals — whom he regarded as having been equally responsible for providing tendentious interpretations of Ricardo.
Compassionate
发表于 2025-3-22 23:32:10
,Ricardo’s Vision, economist. ‘Obviously, in order to be able to posit to ourselves any problems at all, we should first have to visualize a distinct set of coherent phenomena as a worthwhile object of our analytic efforts’. This he termed ‘vision’, which ‘must precede historically the emergence of analytic effort in any field’ (Schumpeter 1954, p. 41).
GRAVE
发表于 2025-3-23 04:15:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2639/263866/263866_9.png
chisel
发表于 2025-3-23 09:31:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2639/263866/263866_10.png