AUGER
发表于 2025-3-25 05:38:25
Timothy L. Porter,Andrew G. SykesAn Array of Critiques of Buddhism”). These arguments would be met with a commensurate Buddhist response in the . (“Exposition of Orthodoxy”) by the Seon monk Gihwa (1376–433), considered by many as one of the sharpest thinkers and writers in the entire Korean Buddhist tradition. Thus, as one of the
占卜者
发表于 2025-3-25 07:56:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260430/260430_22.png
excrete
发表于 2025-3-25 12:05:13
Introduction, the Cheng-Zhu school as the orthodox line of the Confucian tradition. However, Korean Neo-Confucianism emerged with a highly sophisticated level of intellectual and scholarly discourse in interpreting some fundamental Confucian ideas that moved the debate beyond the discussion in the circle of Chin
盖他为秘密
发表于 2025-3-25 18:11:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260430/260430_24.png
小画像
发表于 2025-3-25 23:56:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260430/260430_25.png
infarct
发表于 2025-3-26 04:02:23
“History, Philosophy, and Spirituality of the Four-Seven Debate: The Korean Neo-Confucian Interpreta. I (Yulgok, 1536–1584), and their debaters. It played a powerful role in contributing to the distinctive development of Korean Neo-Confucianism, thereby producing the focused yet divergent interpretations of Sŏngnihak (Cheng-Zhu school/philosophy; literally, “learning of principle and human nature”
Mri485
发表于 2025-3-26 06:15:32
A Sixteenth-Century Neo-Confucian Korean Critical Response to the Chinese L, Zheng’an’s Theory of Huons: in Yeongnam嶺南, Y. Hwang 李滉 (penname: Toegye 退溪, 1501–1571) and J. Sik 曹植 (Nammyung 南冥, 1501–1572); in Honam湖南, Y. Hang 李恒 (Iljae 一齋, 1499–1576), K. Inhoo 金麟厚 (Haseo 河西, 1510–1560), and G. Daeseung 奇大升 (Gobong 高峰, 1527–1572); and in Gyeonggi 京畿, N. Susin 盧守慎 (Sojae 穌齋, 1515–1590), Y. I 李珥 (Yulgo
Communicate
发表于 2025-3-26 10:14:08
S, Kyŏngdŏk and the Rise of the Philosophy of , 氣ophy of Ki 氣.” Although SŎ’s philosophy is a complex synthesis of various positions, it can be regarded as a philosophy of .. SŎ contributed to the formation of an alternative paradigm of thought based more upon . than on . 理 within Korean neo-Confucianism. The key message that underlies SŎ’s philos
沙发
发表于 2025-3-26 14:03:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260430/260430_29.png
surrogate
发表于 2025-3-26 20:25:34
Y, Yulgok’s Life and His Neo-Confucian Synthesis Yulgok was a “synthesizer” in his approach to the some fundamental issues and controversies that dominated the sixteenth century Joseon Neo-Confucianism. Some of most controversial issues that Yulgok dealt with were the relationship between “principle” or . 理 and “vital force” or ./. 氣, the famous