小隔间
发表于 2025-3-25 07:05:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13574-3roup of Warring States thinkers who shared an interest in language, logic, and metaphysics. Their investigations led some of these thinkers to propound various puzzling, paradoxical statements that seem intended to highlight fundamental features of reality or subtleties in semantic relations between
Phonophobia
发表于 2025-3-25 07:42:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260425/260425_22.png
accomplishment
发表于 2025-3-25 12:47:18
Introduction: Chinese Philosophy of Logic, of analytic philosophy have been interested in using logical and other analytical methods to deal with philosophical problems or issues, on the one hand, and in explaining logical concepts to disclose their philosophical implication or significance, on the other. The most salient example of the for
Confidential
发表于 2025-3-25 18:36:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260425/260425_24.png
MUTED
发表于 2025-3-25 22:30:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260425/260425_25.png
Generosity
发表于 2025-3-26 01:07:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260425/260425_26.png
额外的事
发表于 2025-3-26 08:00:30
Counterfactual Conditionalsanguage does not have linguistic markers or other devices to express counterfactuals. He also maintains that, if sometimes argumentation needs counterfactuals, Chinese speakers are incapable to make such kind of argumentation. In this chapter, I will argue that Bloom’s view is not right. As demonstr
IVORY
发表于 2025-3-26 10:36:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260425/260425_28.png
薄膜
发表于 2025-3-26 13:04:34
Contradictional principle of Aristotelian logic. According to this law, an object can’t possess opposite properties at the same time and in the same respect, i.e., “S is both P and not-P at the same time and in the same aspect” (the conjunction of “S is P” and “S is not P”) can’t be true, if P and not-P are cont
文字
发表于 2025-3-26 17:08:36
Analogyer contains an analysis of interpretations of an excerpt from the . 孟子offered by several authors including Zhu Xi, James Legge, D. C. Lau, J.-P. Reding, Chad Hansen, Liu Yameng, and Chris Fraser. The author claims that the first-order predicate logic cannot be used for study of this and other cases