admission
发表于 2025-3-28 18:11:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2604/260390/260390_41.png
Creditee
发表于 2025-3-28 20:47:02
Lucio Olivetti,Salvatore Cuffaris generally, letter writing has always been a favorite means for the practical application of the language. In the Soviet Union, it became particularly important because of its double function, both as a traditional Esperantist activity and also as a means of advancing the cause of international edu
割公牛膨胀
发表于 2025-3-29 00:50:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2604/260390/260390_43.png
Thrombolysis
发表于 2025-3-29 05:31:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2604/260390/260390_44.png
emission
发表于 2025-3-29 08:32:23
Giuseppe Voltini,Lucio Olivettied the discussion. He criticized Nikolai Marr, the creator of a new, materialistic science of language whose authority had until then seemed untouchable. This criticism created a sensation both inside and outside the Soviet Union. Stalin delivered, somewhat late, a theoretical basis for the glorific
军火
发表于 2025-3-29 11:33:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2604/260390/260390_46.png
Abduct
发表于 2025-3-29 18:30:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2604/260390/260390_47.png
鼓掌
发表于 2025-3-29 20:52:27
César Amaral de Camargo Penteadout also that it was accompanied by concrete advantages, namely direct recognition and official status. The World Congresses in Sofia (1963), Budapest (1966 and 1983) and Varna (1978) were not only important manifestations of the revived self-confidence of Esperantists in the socialist countries but
STAT
发表于 2025-3-30 00:20:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05546-2hment of an association went unfulfilled. The vacuum was gradually filled by young Esperanto speakers, who organized camps in forests and mountainous regions. A lively discussion of the relationship between nation and socialism was conducted in scholarly books and journals. In 1966, a 536-page Russi
spondylosis
发表于 2025-3-30 08:07:09
Immediate Loading of Mandibular Overdenturesonized peoples, particularly, have suffered such prohibitions on the use of their languages in schools and public life. Generally it is fear that motivates these prohibitions—fear on the part of the dominant power that such unwelcome languages will foster political or social deviation, perhaps the c