ALOOF
发表于 2025-3-21 18:05:44
书目名称D. H. Lawrence and the Phallic Imagination影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0260016<br><br> <br><br>书目名称D. H. Lawrence and the Phallic Imagination影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0260016<br><br> <br><br>书目名称D. H. Lawrence and the Phallic Imagination网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0260016<br><br> <br><br>书目名称D. H. Lawrence and the Phallic Imagination网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0260016<br><br> <br><br>书目名称D. H. Lawrence and the Phallic Imagination被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0260016<br><br> <br><br>书目名称D. H. Lawrence and the Phallic Imagination被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0260016<br><br> <br><br>书目名称D. H. Lawrence and the Phallic Imagination年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0260016<br><br> <br><br>书目名称D. H. Lawrence and the Phallic Imagination年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0260016<br><br> <br><br>书目名称D. H. Lawrence and the Phallic Imagination读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0260016<br><br> <br><br>书目名称D. H. Lawrence and the Phallic Imagination读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0260016<br><br> <br><br>
即席
发表于 2025-3-21 20:47:10
M. C. Ruiz,I. Gonzalez,J. Salgado,R. Padilla Frank Kermode, Julian Moynahan, and Charles Ross, is there a significant implication that her function in the work and her attachment to Birkin are other than subsidiary or tangential; even their acknowledgements of her resistance to Birkin’s doctrines do not suggest that she provides any compellin
Blanch
发表于 2025-3-22 03:25:23
Shijie Wang,Michael L Free,Patrick R. Taylorrations in . (1970), when she closes her chapter on Lawrence with a roll-call assault on the reputed ‘ethics’ in ‘The Woman Who Rode Away’; she concludes with the charge that the work is merely ‘pandering to pornographic dream’, and that it ‘would reward a careful comparative reading with .; in a nu
Clinch
发表于 2025-3-22 06:46:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2601/260016/260016_4.png
Ringworm
发表于 2025-3-22 09:11:14
Introduction,king links in a progressively developed thesis; rather, each essay functions as a contributing piece of evidence, employing similar methods of critical investigation and pointing towards a verdict that highlights the profundity of Lawrence’s achievement and the inadequacy of many recent commentaries
表被动
发表于 2025-3-22 13:23:17
,Ursula Brangwen and ‘The Essential Criticism’: The Female Corrective in Women in Love, Frank Kermode, Julian Moynahan, and Charles Ross, is there a significant implication that her function in the work and her attachment to Birkin are other than subsidiary or tangential; even their acknowledgements of her resistance to Birkin’s doctrines do not suggest that she provides any compellin
表被动
发表于 2025-3-22 19:30:40
,Snake’s Eye and Obsidian Knife: Art, Ideology, and ‘The Woman Who Rode Away’,rations in . (1970), when she closes her chapter on Lawrence with a roll-call assault on the reputed ‘ethics’ in ‘The Woman Who Rode Away’; she concludes with the charge that the work is merely ‘pandering to pornographic dream’, and that it ‘would reward a careful comparative reading with .; in a nu
patriot
发表于 2025-3-22 23:24:37
Feminist Displeasure and the Loving of Lady Chatterley: Lawrence, Hemingway, Mailer, and the Dialece body of men and women today is just a trained dog. And of no one is this more true than of the free and emancipated young. Above all, their bodies are the bodies of trained dogs.’. Thus not surprisingly today, considerable feminist displeasure often is directed at the structure, premises, and ethi
使隔离
发表于 2025-3-23 01:24:36
Introduction,my argument is based on an integrated analysis of Lawrence’s artistic technique and informing doctrine, with the underlying unity of his poetic intuition and philosophic thought always the prime concern. This organic methodology — an approach surely consistent with Lawrence’s claims as a visionary a
Prognosis
发表于 2025-3-23 07:13:18
Forging and Feminism: Sons and Lovers and the Phallic Imagination, of masculine assertion and independence is widely regarded as inappropriate to the fashionable androgyny of contemporary culture. Clearly, this early work is a hymn to the phallus, as the shape of . — from plot to moralism to metaphor — reflects Lawrence’s purging effort, as artist and prophet, to